WSM Polaris 800 1200 Piston Kit 010-835-06K .75mm 84.75mm OE 2200920, 2201706

WSM Polaris 800 1200 Piston Kit 010-835-06K .75mm 84.75mm OE 2200920, 2201706

Marsoni

M251S

$75.07

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

WSM Polaris 800 1200 Piston Kit 010-835-06K .75mm 84.75mm OE 2200920, 2201706WSM Polaris 800 1200 high performance piston kit Kit includes rings, pins and clips. . 75mm SIZE ONLY 84. 75mm OEM #: 2200920, 2201706 Make Model CC HP Year Polaris Octane 800 2002 Polaris Octane 800 2003 Polaris Octane 800 2004 Polaris Virage 800 2002 Polaris Virage 800 2003 Polaris Virage 800 2004 Polaris Genesis 1200 1999 Polaris Genesis 1200 2000 Polaris Genesis 1200 2001 Polaris Genesis 1200 2002 Polaris Genesis 1200 2003 Polaris Genesis 1200

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your WSM Polaris 800 1200 Piston Kit 010-835-06K .75mm 84.75mm OE 2200920, 2201706 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your WSM Polaris 800 1200 Piston Kit 010-835-06K .75mm 84.75mm OE 2200920, 2201706 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about WSM Polaris 800 1200 Piston Kit 010-835-06K .75mm 84.75mm OE 2200920, 2201706, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for WSM Polaris 800 1200 Piston Kit 010-835-06K .75mm 84.75mm OE 2200920, 2201706 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

If these pants are the right look for what you want/need, they're a reasonably good quality option. But that said, in practice these looked a little "cheesy" with the black stripe. I can't say for sure that's a result of how the product is made/how it looks, but I just couldn't see myself wearing them. That's assuming I could wear them... In terms of fit, they were slightly small in the waist for both pairs I ordered. I'm not sure what I thought they meant when I read that they were unhemmed, but for those looking for pants to take out of the box and wear... these aren't for you. The ankles are not "finished" and require hemming to make them look acceptable. (This was my fault, so I didn't count off for this)

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on July 8, 2021

Verified Purchase

Chiaro

Birmingham, US

★★★★★ 3

They stand out, and are flashy, but sizing is complicated.

Size: 34, Color: Black With White Strip, Size: 34, Color: Black With White Strip

High-quality pants and flashy. The stripe adds a lot of attention for reasons both good and bad. The materials they were made are excellent quality. Pants are thick, but not too thick, and are lightweight, guaranteeing easy movement. Comfortable - could wear these all day. I do love their appearance. They made me feel like a million bucks. :) The only problem is sizing and fit. I normally wear size 34 for waist in jeans and dress pants like these, but the 34 I got didn't fit at all - too tight. So, I ordered a 36, and it fit, but barely. When I sat down, there was too much tightness in my "masculine area". I also ordered a 38, and, well, they were just too big - practically hung off me. A 37 would probably work for me in these, but they don't offer such a size. I have to return the 34 and 38. Will keep the 36, see if I can have it altered in some way. Length was fine. Being 1.86 meters, often the length in these pants is a little on the short side. In the photo, I'm wearing size 36 and the black pair with the gold stripe, which is actually more of a flashy yellow. I liked how I looked in them, but they were a little too tight at times, the belt wasn't even necessary. It enhanced the outfit though, don't you think.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on July 20, 2025